Centrisity

Shot from the hip . . .

Mitch Berg, over at Shot in the Dark, a Righty Tighty blog "made up" what he calls Berg's Law; "No liberal commentator can simultaneously attack more than one of the four justifications for the Liberation of Iraq; to do so, they'd invalidate their own case."

Seems Berg is confusing rationale for disarmament with justification to unilaterally invade a sovereign country.

Now, don't get me wrong, I have always called these reasons my justification for ending the terroristic regime of SoDamn Who'sInsane, but GW was so hung up on WMDs he couldn't see the forest for the trees.

See, in his 2003 State of the Union (SOTU) address, he banters about WMDs as his sole reason for war and the only justification he needed. He talks of the other three items, UN Resolutions, Human Rights violations, and the uses of chemicals on his own people, as reasons to disarm him, not as a pretext to war.

So much for Berg's law . . . . although he does try to defend himself HERE

Flash --> For the war for the right reasons, NOT the Right reason